| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock P75 Pro3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131223 |
| Uptime | 4.9 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 03 '20 at 11:10 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 34% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.9%
Above average
|
63% 105 Pts
|
29% 228 Pts
|
13% 217 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
32% 37.9 fps
|
22% 26.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 176 94 96 94 95 MB/s
|
77.5%
Very good
|
74% 329 MB/s
|
126% 43 MB/s
|
201% 269 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
543GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 180 185 174 184 186 MB/s
|
92%
Outstanding
|
84% 116 MB/s
|
305% 2.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
47.9%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
56% 72 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 31 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock P75 Pro3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 4x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 3x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $574 |