Asus X540YA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus X540YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540YA
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180515
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 07:36
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 29.4
2-Core 29.6
29% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 88.8
8-Core 77.6
11% 83.2 Pts
64-Core 82.9
5% 82.9 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Asus(1043 1360) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 1.93
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 3.25
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.43
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 321
Write 190
Mixed 275
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 11.2
50% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 130
103% 144 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF1G64HDZ-1G6A1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X540YA Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X540YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback