Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Memory 17.8 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 52.8 18% 32.3 Pts	4-Core 98.2 8-Core 102 13% 99.8 Pts	64-Core 90.2 6% 90.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8245) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 2.84 2% 2.98 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 3.26 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 25 127 28 104 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.1% Very poor	Read 87.5 Write 39.2 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 52 14% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 7.3 25% 8.77 MB/s	DQ Read 16.9 DQ Write 17.5 DQ Mixed 15 12% 16.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x8GB 25,310 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 5.7 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 337 12% 337 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16