Acer Swift SF314-41

Performance Results

Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-41  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Strongbow_PK
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '20 at 21:44
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 39.2
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 116
40% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 383
39% 309 Pts
64-Core 392
26% 392 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 1378) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.41.38
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 3.59
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 3.48
2% 3.01 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 578 611 618 624 634 628 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 782
Write 612
Mixed 645
SusWrite 616
149% 663 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 37
128% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 515
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 485
364% 485 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 130%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.5
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Swift SF314-41 Builds (Compare 1,111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 57%
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-41

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback