Acer Aspire TC-105

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire TC-105 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-105
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '20 at 17:15
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130 12,547 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 79.9 1-Core 51.1 2-Core 134 54% 88.5 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 219 29% 218 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 0620) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 0.91 2% 1.66 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 80 87 88 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 13.5 Write 110 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 83.7 42% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.1 34% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 109%
Samsung HD401LJ 400GB 1,767 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 372GB free Firmware: ZZ100-15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 74 75 74 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 70.9 Write 75.2 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 74.5 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 42%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 212GB free Firmware: 0006HPM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 76 75 75 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 98.3 Write 94.4 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 75.3 59% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.C8F CT51264BD160BJ.C8F Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.8% Poor	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-105 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-105

CPU
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples	54x
A8-6500 APUAMD $135Bench 50%, 7,219 samples	7x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	14x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	5x
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples	4x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 480GBSpccBench 81%, 3,502 samples	2x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x

RAM
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 3x4GBKingstonBench 35%, 236 samples	6x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,425 samples	6x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 556 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16