Toshiba dynabook R64/P

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba dynabook R64/P (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA dynabook R64/P
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160317
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '20 at 06:59
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5300U 29,898 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket BGA1168, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 89 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 107 58% 88.8 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 160 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 56%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 0004) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.69 Parallax 4.97 3% 4.82 fps	MRender 6.52 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 8.09 5% 6.01 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 4%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.8% Poor	Lighting 35.3 Reflection 27.5 Parallax 36 29% 32.9 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 35.8 Splatting 33.5 29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 mSATA 128GB 3,217 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUT10101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 400 387 370 380 358 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 433 Write 353 Mixed 391 SusWrite 380 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 39.7 125% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 305 233% 316 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.7 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16