Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 13:30
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 131
61% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 430
40% 331 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 64.1
59% 70.5 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 70.6
58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 371 381 409 439 408 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 480
Write 426
Mixed 387
SusWrite 386
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 41.2
110% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 98
DQ Mixed 45.5
66% 128 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
48GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 287 296 265 223 215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 430
Write 412
Mixed 369
SusWrite 268
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 44.2
144% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 236
177% 236 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89%
Great: 124%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
371GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 78 78 77 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 75
SusWrite 77.4
66% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 13
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback