Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 93.1 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 85 60% 88 Pts	4-Core 88.2 8-Core 89.1 12% 88.6 Pts	64-Core 45.2 3% 45.2 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% ASRock(1849 3E92) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.55% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 7.15 Parallax 7.25 5% 7.02 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 13.9 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.55% Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 460 SE 3,122 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Gigabyte(1458 350D) 1GB CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 12 11% 14.1 fps	MRender 19 Gravity 13.6 Splatting 16.6 13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ RevoDrive 3 PCIe 240GB-$600 224 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 187 191 181 187 191 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 286 Write 191 Mixed 226 SusWrite 187 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 23.2 93% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 153 140% 216 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 81%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$229 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 523GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 87 88 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 74.2 SusWrite 87.4 71% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 86%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79 6,381 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: CV23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 189 190 190 196 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 190 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 190 118% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.6% Good	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 22.3 64% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 18 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 62 65% 62 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	108x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	106x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	95x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	81x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	70x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	46x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 30,689 samples	42x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	36x

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $732

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16