Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 08 '20 at 17:14
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$101 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 170 60% 105 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 630 56% 477 Pts	64-Core 587 36% 587 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27% Poor	Lighting 28.9 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 30.2 24% 30.3 fps	MRender 30.3 Gravity 54.5 Splatting 38.5 34% 41.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S700 Pro 512GB-$79 1,249 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 248GB free Firmware: Q0308D_H SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 357 361 381 370 372 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 442 Write 389 Mixed 366 SusWrite 361 88% 389 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 25.3 89% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 94.2 DQ Mixed 54.4 64% 113 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 120%
HP S700 Pro 512GB-$79 1,249 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 242GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0308D_H SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 354 357 378 369 162 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 444 Write 403 Mixed 372 SusWrite 323 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 24 90% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 54.6 64% 113 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 120%
PNY CS900 480GB-$42 17,946 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 104GB free Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 23 38 2.8 25 2.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 322 Write 158 Mixed 258 SusWrite 39.6 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 23.1 84% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 95.3 DQ Mixed 18 43% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 102%
Sandisk SD7SB7S512G1122 512GB 1,543 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 147GB free Firmware: X3540000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 195 202 133 73 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 398 Write 362 Mixed 292 SusWrite 157 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 27.5 93% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 207 170% 246 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 68GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 208 184 177 163 179 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 436 Write 428 Mixed 382 SusWrite 205 81% 363 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 38.3 128% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 254 197% 272 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 124%
PNY SSD2SC240G3LC726B104-370I 240GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 95GB free Firmware: 524ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 251 218 189 174 171 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 368 Write 256 Mixed 252 SusWrite 208 60% 271 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 25.2 87% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 207 162% 224 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 82%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 505GB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 147 140 146 139 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 139 Write 142 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 143 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 82%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 557GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 174 172 171 173 167 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 165 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 170 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 418% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 109%
WD My Book 25EE 10TB 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 37.8 Write 35.2 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 36 48% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 1.5 195% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MR[A/B]4U266GHHF8G F4-3200C16-16GVK MR[A/B]4U266GHHF8G 32GB 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.1% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 13.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	79x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	59x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $971

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)