Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 10 '20 at 02:35
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 213 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 660 62% 517 Pts	64-Core 1192 74% 1192 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.1% Above average	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 72.7 Parallax 103 61% 83.3 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 75 Splatting 56.9 53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 342GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 659 563 585 750 793 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1,247 Write 830 Mixed 976 SusWrite 680 209% 933 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 37.6 139% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 736 DQ Write 83.7 DQ Mixed 167 184% 329 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 324GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 366 368 392 387 369 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 453 Write 402 Mixed 411 SusWrite 374 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 31.7 108% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 49.1 DQ Mixed 116 111% 184 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 173GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 280 220 176 173 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 463 Write 404 Mixed 344 SusWrite 227 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 30.5 107% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 45 DQ Mixed 107 105% 178 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 183GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 99 103 99 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 165 Write 138 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 100 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 336GB free Firmware: CC3C SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 89 88 89 97 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 76 Write 68 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 87.4 47% 64.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.4 188% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 144 131 167 155 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 45 Write 99.7 Mixed 45 SusWrite 150 62% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 30,689 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 23.2 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 19.4 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,949x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	436x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	403x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	285x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	283x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	247x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	285x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	228x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	213x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	278x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)