Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V12.1
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 21:32
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 252
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 747
73% 596 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Lighting 95.2
Reflection 115
Parallax 89.8
78% 100 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 90.7
Splatting 98.7
77% 93.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 465 480 485 493 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 487
Mixed 355
SusWrite 478
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 40.2
150% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 182
183% 295 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
180GB free
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 327 327 327 327 326 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,895
Write 1,311
Mixed 844
SusWrite 357
244% 1,102 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 79.7
276% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,523
DQ Write 1,240
DQ Mixed 1,070
886% 1,278 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 244%
Great: 236%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
282GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 96 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 93
Write 97.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 95
55% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FAD1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FAD1 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.7% Good
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V12.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $369
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback