| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Alienware Area-51m (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware Alienware Area-51m |
| Memory | 19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190905 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | May 15 '20 at 05:42 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
86% 158 Pts
|
81% 649 Pts
|
76% 1,236 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
62.5%
Good
|
59% 79.7 fps
|
69% 87.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 43 29 23 22 26 MB/s
|
66.7%
Good
|
48% 226 MB/s
|
72% 21.6 MB/s
|
135% 266 MB/s
|
|
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
386GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 86 97 97 97 102 MB/s
|
44.7%
Average
|
54% 73 MB/s
|
185% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
58.8%
Above average
|
61% 21.3 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
43% 93.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Area-51m Builds (Compare 535 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware Area-51m
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 216x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 186x |
| Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 100x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 112%, 4,380 samples | 204x |
| GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples | 94x |
| RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples | 80x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $412 |