Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-600
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 01:57
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 660
68% 550 Pts
64-Core 821
51% 821 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Sapphire(174B 1071) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2112 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 109
Parallax 103
86% 106 fps
MRender 99.4
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 98.1
80% 98.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 828
Write 566
Mixed 578
146% 657 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 40.6
137% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 44.2
103% 198 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 21 16 44 23 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 5 10 10 12 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
9.04% Terrible
Read 25
Write 8.5
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 8.6
16% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
80% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 9%
General UDisk 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 3.5 3.6 4.6 4.6 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4
7% 5.55 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO2P26KC8T1-BPYS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.2% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.8
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 20.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $584
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback