Today's hottest deals

Asus G73Jw

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G73Jw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101108
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '17 at 02:51
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 90.5
1-Core 63
2-Core 93
55% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 207
23% 182 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 203D) 1.5GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 361.91
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
7% Terrible
Lighting 7.87
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 6.47
6% 7.93 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 8.63
Splatting 10.5
8% 9.89 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 182
Write 86.1
Mixed 115
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 10.7
51% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 29.5
47% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
25GB free
Firmware: SD22 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 50.5
Write 60.6
Mixed 54.3
42% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.27
65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate Ultra Slim PL 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab2d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 111
Write 99.9
Mixed 52.9
106% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 5.11
4K Mixed 0.51
195% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Samsung S2 Portable 3 1TB
209GB free, PID 60a6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 28
Write 22.4
Mixed 25.5
32% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.22
53% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback