Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive4.48% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '20 at 17:40
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 117
51% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 271
27% 220 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.3% Good
Lighting 76.4
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 75.6
62% 76.8 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 74
60% 72.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 9.6 22 82 88 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
4.48% Terrible
Read 50
Write 78.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 39.2
10% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 90%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 478GB
154GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 375 311 55 7.4 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 61%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
724GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 81 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 93.1
Mixed 50
SusWrite 80.1
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 16GB
15GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 6.3 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
7.08% Terrible
Read 22
Write 11.5
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 6.9
18% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.08%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 11.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 9.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $909
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback