Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 42.5 1-Core 18.3 2-Core 48.2 24% 36.3 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 180 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M 7,774 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 2106) 2GB CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 4.77 Parallax 3.87 3% 4.24 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 2.96 3% 4.32 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 68 78 16 136 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 361 Write 207 Mixed 244 SusWrite 73.7 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 12.3 43% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 106 91% 131 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	36.7% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	30x

RAM
16JTF51264HZ-1G4M1 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBMicronBench 49%, 28 samples	6x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	4x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GBHynixBench 39%, 184 samples	2x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $260

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16