Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 28 '20 at 15:16
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 141 2-Core 272 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 564 8-Core 1,083 98% 824 Pts	64-Core 1,135 70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.2% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 116 Parallax 107 94% 113 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 94.2 Splatting 82.3 82% 103 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 292GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 1100 1058 1017 1020 1000 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	316% Outstanding	Read 2,501 Write 2,205 Mixed 1015 SusWrite 998 374% 1,680 MB/s	4K Read 60 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 90.6 299% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,498 DQ Write 1,271 DQ Mixed 1,143 922% 1304 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 316% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 298GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2214 2217 2217 2222 2219 2216 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	392% Outstanding	Read 2,608 Write 2,198 Mixed 1596 SusWrite 2,218 484% 2,155 MB/s	4K Read 58.2 4K Write 185 4K Mixed 81 290% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,478 DQ Write 1378 DQ Mixed 1,413 1,064% 1,423 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 392% Great: 393%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GB 23,313 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 24.1 85% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 25.9 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,612x
Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,215x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	829x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	480x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	428x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	295x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	217x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	360x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16