Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 30 '20 at 20:09
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 71.4 1-Core 134 2-Core 269 85% 158 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 1,065 95% 801 Pts	64-Core 2,047 127% 2,047 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.6% Poor	Lighting 26.7 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 25 22% 27.5 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 26.7 Splatting 34.8 27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 303 308 307 308 305 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 494 Mixed 406 SusWrite 323 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 58.2 198% 69.4 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 367 278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 359GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 493 489 494 403 293 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 493 Mixed 467 SusWrite 444 108% 479 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 57.6 194% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 370 279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 476GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 93 92 92 94 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 92.8 Write 90.9 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 92.3 63% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GFX 2x8GB 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.2% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 27.4 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 24.6 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 126%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	64x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	57x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	52x

RAM
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZR 4x8GBGBench 94%, 9,782 samples	41x
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZR 2x8GBGBench 90%, 10,185 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	25x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $988

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16