Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '20 at 18:21
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 93.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 236 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 648 68% 546 Pts	64-Core 825 51% 825 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q) 7,789 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.8% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 133 Parallax 119 96% 123 fps	MRender 150 Gravity 101 Splatting 96 92% 116 fps
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA5-8D512 512GB 1,283 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQ20901 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 149 163 168 155 187 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 1,394 Write 109 Mixed 144 SusWrite 154 96% 450 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 44.5 158% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1242 DQ Write 91.9 DQ Mixed 83.5 208% 472 MB/s
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 261%
Samsung Portable SSD X5 2TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 644GB free Firmware: 1P3QEXE7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 71 66 65 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 1,219 Write 139 Mixed 240 SusWrite 93.6 90% 423 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 3.5 74% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 381%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.5% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 21.1 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 24.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 60.7 66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,060x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,070x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,447x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	596x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	398x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,754x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16