Hp-pavilion RS884AA-ABH m7780.nl-a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive16.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion RS884AA-ABH m7780.nl-a  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek LEONITE
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 15:28
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6300-$40
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 40.8
32% 42.7 Pts
4-Core 41
8-Core 39.9
5% 40.5 Pts
64-Core 40.8
2% 40.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 18 17 15 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 162
Write 52
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 16.4
14% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 7.8
24% 8.63 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 18.6
DQ Mixed 7.6
9% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
13GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 6.9
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback