Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 960 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130514
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 12 '20 at 21:17
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 446
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
MSI(1462 2833) 2GB
CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 53.7
36% 46.2 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 38.1
38% 47.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 377
Write 230
Mixed 283
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 38.4
140% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 65.8
82% 152 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 104%
Adata SP580 120GB
80GB free
Firmware: V3.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 226 221 234 231 225 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 348
Write 237
Mixed 242
SusWrite 220
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 10.1
71% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 79
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 14.6
36% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 70%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
32GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 117 108 108 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.4% Above average
Read 255
Write 151
Mixed 178
SusWrite 111
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 31.2
109% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 108
87% 120 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
107GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 169 159 149 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 179
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 160
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97%
Great: 112%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 6 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6.2
6% 4.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback