Medion Erazer X7842 MD99690

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Medion Erazer X7842 MD99690 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION P670RE1M
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151105
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '20 at 14:16
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	8%
CPU Throttled	61%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 100 48% 75.6 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 251 26% 207 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 41 Parallax 1.28 1% 14.5 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 2.61 2% 1.96 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 26 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 374 Write 132 Mixed 158 SusWrite 27.3 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 12.2 44% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 22.7 DQ Mixed 39.8 42% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 43GB free Firmware: AM0P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 101 85 87 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 98 Write 100 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 94.1 59% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair SODIM DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB 607 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 22.7 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X7842 MD99690 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7842 MD99690

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	7x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	4x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	5x
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	2x
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWDBench 217%, 23,579 samples	2x

RAM
HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GBHynixBench 36%, 9,725 samples	5x
HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 2,917 samples	3x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16