Today's hottest deals

Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 73.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 278
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 538
74% 547 Pts
64-Core 817
50% 817 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$170
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 113
Parallax 95.2
83% 103 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 99
80% 98 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revuahn 960X 250GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 264 300 276 303 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 128
Write 228
Mixed 201
SusWrite 295
49% 213 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 2.4
10% 4.27 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 102
99% 154 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 119%
USB DISK Pro 2GB
2GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.81% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 15.2
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 12.9
21% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TZD512M8U24-SS001 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 30.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 28.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback