HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Laptop 15-da0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84A6
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '20 at 05:15
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 83 1-Core 60.3 2-Core 99.1 53% 80.8 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 201 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB 6,890 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9002s16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 111 92 45 46 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 826 Write 579 Mixed 230 SusWrite 77.8 94% 428 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 35.2 132% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 46.7 43% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 197%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 592GB free Firmware: RSM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 116 121 121 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 74 Write 110 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 118 65% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 13GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 10 10 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.57% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 4.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 9.4 9% 7.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.4 85% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.57% Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 2GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.8 3.5 3.9 3.5 3.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.98% Terrible	Read 23.7 Write 5.3 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.6 9% 9.27 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.6 99% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.98% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	35.6% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 9.8 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 10.9 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 4,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	1,514x
Core i3-7020UIntelBench 40%, 28,454 samples	979x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	673x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	2,164x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,683x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	297x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	130x
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	121x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	101x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	636x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	374x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	359x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16