Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8478
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190507
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '20 at 13:17
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 183 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 476 49% 396 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB 20,171 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD70H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 126 124 122 119 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 962 Write 773 Mixed 347 SusWrite 125 122% 552 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 26 147% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 543 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 248 215% 328 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 235%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB 54,777 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	62.5% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.5 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 15.8 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,150x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	954x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	749x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	343x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	228x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1006 128GBWDCBench 121%, 4,055 samples	178x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	630x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	305x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 59%, 11,378 samples	282x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16