PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171108 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '20 at 05:54 |
Run Duration | 193 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$38
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0330AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 62 56 60 36 32 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
577GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 94 94 94 MB/s
|
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
797GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 74 78 70 72 75 MB/s
|
49.2%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 74 78 70 72 75 MB/s
|
68.9%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
68GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 57 62 37 33 MB/s
|
35.7%
Below average
|
|||
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
46GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 15 15 12 14 16 MB/s
|
8.38%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 371x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 273x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 76x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 132x |
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 56x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $134 |