Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 07:39
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 135
58% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 841
66% 585 Pts
64-Core 1469
91% 1469 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 102
Reflection 140
Parallax 157
83% 133 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 133
Splatting 107
112% 142 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
628GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 818 1072 1176 1106 1036 521 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,311
Write 1,395
Mixed 1,020
SusWrite 955
263% 1,170 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 56.2
188% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 529
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 272
262% 414 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 191%
Great: 255%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
178GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 378 407 438 436 437 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 432
Mixed 376
SusWrite 403
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 45.3
149% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 188
138% 180 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 131%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 202 207 211 210 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 151
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 206
111% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 109%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3600C18K2D 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 34.7
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 32.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback