Medion MD34212/C750

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion MD34212/C750 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B360H4-EM
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '20 at 16:53
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 233 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 378 43% 335 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Elitegroup(1019 1039) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 105 Parallax 99.9 5% 70.1 fps	MRender 92.3 Gravity 90.2 Splatting 95.7 76% 92.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98 11,843 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 75 79 46 61 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 337 Write 170 Mixed 207 SusWrite 59.9 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 36.4 137% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 69.3 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 89.7 78% 112 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 637GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 38 33 49 52 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 157 Write 59.5 Mixed 44 SusWrite 55.8 58% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	34.6% Below average	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 21.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34212/C750 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Medion MD34212/C750

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	6x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	2x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBIntel $98Bench 98%, 11,843 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	3x
KHX2400C15/8G Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GBKingstonBench 69%, 97 samples	2x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $361

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16