Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180319
Uptime	13.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '20 at 01:28
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	BOL-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 216 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 604 64% 509 Pts	64-Core 661 41% 661 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 5 Parallax 3.41 3% 4.17 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 4.23 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.34 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 452 Write 398 Mixed 12.5 63% 288 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$65 3,754 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 927GB free Firmware: 01.01V03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 128 129 129 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 132 Write 129 Mixed 102 SusWrite 128 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 77%
hp v115w 4GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 3d07 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.6 4.9 4.8 5 4.9 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	5.27% Terrible	Read 20 Write 3.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.7 9% 8.43 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.27% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 1x8GB 2,417 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11.1 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	444x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	250x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	223x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	145x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	135x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	69x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	85x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16