Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HQ 33,920 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 200 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 367 51% 380 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB 4,026 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 47 48 47 48 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 406 Write 56.2 Mixed 118 SusWrite 48.7 34% 157 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 27.8 105% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 95.6 DQ Mixed 119 116% 192 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.5% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 24.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 19.4 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 140%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1,314x
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples	504x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	291x

SSD
THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 122%, 19,561 samples	82x
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 140%, 7,011 samples	55x
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 120%, 13,766 samples	45x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	344x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 5,035 samples	261x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 69%, 5,073 samples	155x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16