Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 10:58
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 149
60% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 383
43% 332 Pts
64-Core 440
30% 440 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420
Nvidia(10DE 1162) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 13
3% 10.7 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 14.7
4% 12.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$45
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 219 221 257 226 246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 408
Write 244
Mixed 250
SusWrite 229
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 29
104% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 168
142% 207 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 122%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
175GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 120 124 125 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 118
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 123
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
47GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 92 91 91 93 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 90
Write 77
Mixed 72
SusWrite 92.6
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$38
392GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 118 120 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 120
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 26.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 28.9
20% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 101%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
12GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 10 8.8 6.4 13 9.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
8.84% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 3.3
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 9.3
17% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
81% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.84%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 3,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $258

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $587
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback