Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 18:13
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 79.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 840
87% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,061
71% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 150
Parallax 159
128% 156 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
114% 142 fps
Poor: 104%
This bench: 121%
Great: 128%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$115
392GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 476 477 477 478 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 476
Mixed 461
SusWrite 477
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61
207% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 356
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$39
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 53 67 61 67 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 458
Write 53.4
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 67.5
32% 152 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 14.6
106% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 17.2
47% 101 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 77%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
254GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 476 477 477 418 285 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 471
Mixed 458
SusWrite 435
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 61.1
208% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 128%
Great: 130%
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
402GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1562 837 837 832 839 838 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,564
Write 1,899
Mixed 1,459
SusWrite 957
331% 1470 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 75.4
294% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,494
DQ Write 1,263
DQ Mixed 1,325
1,007% 1,361 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 272%
Great: 271%
SSK 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 386 387 387 387 388 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 384
Mixed 365
SusWrite 387
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 44.9
144% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 246
180% 237 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 94%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 102 100 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 105
Write 96.7
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 102
124% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
55% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3134 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 32.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 32
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 5,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $858
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $277Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback