Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 225 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 404 51% 388 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 876B) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Lighting 17 Reflection 18 Parallax 22 14% 19 fps	MRender 15.5 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 21.4 15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI220400 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 425 Write 300 Mixed 132 63% 286 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 13.9 66% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 61 DQ Mixed 16.4 31% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 52%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB 4,670 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 58GB free Firmware: GT001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 62 61 61 61 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 62.9 Write 65.4 Mixed 19 SusWrite 61 38% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB 77,202 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	86.9% Excellent	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 29.4 91% 32 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 23.1 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $322

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16