Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170920
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateAug 15 '20 at 00:51
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 248
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 455
61% 453 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 72.6
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 65.3
59% 70.9 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 72.1
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 96 92 82 89 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 447
Mixed 366
SusWrite 121
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 57.5
197% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 354
268% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 144 143 141 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 148
Write 145
Mixed 111
SusWrite 143
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 1.2
54% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 38%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
587GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 103 101 100 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 71
Write 86.2
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 101
61% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 66%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
34GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 35 30 20 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 96.7
Write 30.7
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 28.2
59% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
67% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 39%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 135 132 137 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 137
Mixed 104
SusWrite 134
173% 127 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.1
326% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $938
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback