PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming (all builds) |
Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170920 |
Uptime | 10.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 15 '20 at 00:51 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
79.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
|
58.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 96 92 82 89 85 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 144 143 141 145 MB/s
|
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 4TB
587GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 103 101 100 104 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
34GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 35 30 20 19 MB/s
|
22.8%
Poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 135 132 137 136 MB/s
|
74.2%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 988x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 328x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 164x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 255x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 243x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 213x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $938 |