Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131014
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 08:58
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 83
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 99.1
54% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 96.6
8-Core 97.6
13% 97.1 Pts
64-Core 92.1
6% 92.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 550
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 21.4
15% 23 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 34
22% 26.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 60GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 57 58 59 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.5% Average
Read 166
Write 62.3
Mixed 90
SusWrite 56.8
21% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 25.4
98% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 85.4
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 70.8
54% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 80%
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB
185GB free
Firmware: KF100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 89.6
Write 92.1
Mixed 54
SusWrite 91.6
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
267GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 97 98 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 93.5
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 96.2
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.7
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-HD+ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback