Asrock Z97 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150512
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateAug 29 '20 at 07:13
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 201
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 346
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4889
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.97
3% 5.4 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 7.43
5% 5.81 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 63.7
48% 62.8 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 53.4
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 214 187 179 150 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 286
Write 229
Mixed 159
SusWrite 192
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 28.2
107% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 130
121% 190 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
129GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 93 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 115
Write 95
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 100
60% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 107%
LaCie Rugged FW/USB 500GB
261GB free, PID 100c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 39 39 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 40
Mixed 29
SusWrite 39.6
50% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme4 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $777
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback