PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 7.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130410 |
Uptime | 8.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 03 '20 at 22:07 |
Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 59% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.3%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
52.6%
Above average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 343 350 349 349 343 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 343 321 317 316 318 MB/s
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
965GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 89 85 79 81 80 MB/s
|
41.5%
Average
|
|||
USB DISK 2.0 64GB
21GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.1 1.8 2.1 3.6 2.5 MB/s
|
1.91%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.8 4.8 5.2 6.7 6.5 MB/s
|
4.8%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |