Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 130% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '20 at 15:25
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 91.6 1-Core 159 2-Core 317 102% 189 Pts	4-Core 603 8-Core 1,067 101% 835 Pts	64-Core 2193 136% 2193 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 143 Parallax 142 124% 146 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 125 Splatting 103 108% 136 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,729 Write 2,345 Mixed 1,905 517% 2,326 MB/s	4K Read 71.5 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 97.9 329% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,465 DQ Write 1,351 DQ Mixed 1,397 1,051% 1,404 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499 4,125 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 199GB free Firmware: 5.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 227 227 228 221 227 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 401 Write 289 Mixed 295 SusWrite 219 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 42.4 163% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 244 194% 271 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 92%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52 41,501 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 611GB free Firmware: JE4OA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	42% Average	Read 59.5 Write 58.1 Mixed 36 SusWrite 86.7 44% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 9,684 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 50.1 MC Write 42.4 MC Mixed 39.6 126% 44 GB/s	SC Read 28.7 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 36.9 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,040x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	450x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	395x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	330x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	310x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	256x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	89x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	84x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	77x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	103x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	97x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16