HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP ENVY 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 168A
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130122
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 140
56% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 357
36% 295 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7690M-XT
HP(103C 168A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.882.2.2000
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 6
6% 7.16 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.91
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 238 191 181 181 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 401
Write 380
Mixed 283
SusWrite 193
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 17.4
59% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 68
122% 240 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 111%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: 2BA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 70 78 73 73 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47% Average
Read 87.5
Write 91
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 76.3
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
112% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47%
Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
1TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 139
Write 95.8
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 16.5
92% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 65%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
40GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 33 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 53.3
Write 42.8
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 34
57% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 43%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
546GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 16 16 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 100
Write 71.8
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 16.9
75% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 43%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
981GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 89.3
Write 87.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 16.5
65% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.6
255% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 3TB
644GB free, PID 50a5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 34 33 32 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 71.5
Write 34.3
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 32.1
66% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
64GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 128
Write 78
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 16.5
81% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate FreeAgent 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 29.5
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 24.9
36% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 99U5428-079.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $289
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback