User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemECT
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 23:41
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 60
2-Core 118
51% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 299
33% 259 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Gigabyte(1458 2554) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 48.3
29% 39.1 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 38.6
28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 155 156 141 147 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 384
Write 200
Mixed 144
SusWrite 149
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 24
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 107
98% 150 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56%
Great: 99%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
110GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 271 318 302 314 327 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 442
Write 322
Mixed 106
SusWrite 299
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 10
44% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 13.5
12% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
100GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 281 326 312 321 331 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 450
Write 325
Mixed 252
SusWrite 306
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 11.9
72% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 80.5
85% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 70 69 71 72 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 32.4
Write 87.4
Mixed 35
SusWrite 71.4
41% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 105%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
320GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 94 96 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 93.6
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 93.7
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 21
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback