PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds) |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20151023 |
Uptime | 2.8 Days |
Run Date | Sep 15 '20 at 18:36 |
Run Duration | 184 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
78.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 299 303 300 299 293 MB/s
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
564GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 89 101 101 MB/s
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
764GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 210 211 210 210 211 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
1TB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 94 91 95 95 MB/s
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
0GB free, PID null
|
||||
ST310005 28AS 1TB
907GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 41 41 40 MB/s
|
20%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 586x |
Core i5-6400Intel $100Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 455x |
Core i5-6500Intel $70Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 455x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 553x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 394x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 240x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $433 |