Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '20 at 15:57
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 276
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 772
72% 600 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 102
Parallax 114
85% 106 fps
MRender 91
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 82.4
73% 90.3 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 317 322 323 325 323 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,787
Write 1,192
Mixed 800
SusWrite 349
228% 1,032 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 83.6
282% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,554
DQ Write 1,154
DQ Mixed 1,027
856% 1,245 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 240%
Great: 243%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
270GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 124 122 124 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 185
Write 143
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 123
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
783GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 168 165 166 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 157
Mixed 108
SusWrite 166
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.5% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 24
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback