PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock E3V5 Performance Gaming/OC (all builds) |
Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160203 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 17 '20 at 03:52 |
Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
69.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 96 93 92 89 88 MB/s
|
79.2%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.9%
Good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E3-1230 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,254 samples | 20x |
Xeon E3-1240 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,434 samples | 13x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 6x |
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $227 |