Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '20 at 20:42
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 67.9 1-Core 148 2-Core 294 90% 170 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 812 81% 661 Pts	64-Core 1,049 65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 72.3 Reflection 75.9 Parallax 64.8 59% 71 fps	MRender 71.2 Gravity 69.3 Splatting 69.5 57% 70 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB 26,501 User benchmarks, average bench 162% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 1002 434 258 255 257 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 1,268 Write 1,025 Mixed 1,056 SusWrite 538 218% 971 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 68.1 236% 85.3 MB/s	DQ Read 791 DQ Write 780 DQ Mixed 781 588% 784 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 223%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 125GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 447 448 450 399 383 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 440 Mixed 427 SusWrite 429 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 81.4 4K Mixed 53.6 175% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 203 148% 191 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 210GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 427 427 430 371 376 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 424 Mixed 414 SusWrite 410 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 47.5 152% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 186 137% 179 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 86 84 95 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	35% Below average	Read 36 Write 80.4 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 86.1 40% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 108%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 41GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 25 22 16 15 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	6.92% Terrible	Read 10.4 Write 20.9 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 19.1 22% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.92% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB 47,657 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.2% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 26.3 68% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 26 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $154Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	569x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16