Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 19:01
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 259
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 668
73% 577 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 242
Parallax 239
146% 220 fps
MRender 264
Gravity 220
Splatting 148
166% 211 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 143%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 545 613 610 612 603 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 603
Write 594
Mixed 576
SusWrite 560
132% 583 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 67.1
211% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 1,015
690% 841 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 158%
Great: 288%
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$180
223GB free
Firmware: LAEi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 200 198 214 202 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 405
Write 291
Mixed 286
SusWrite 204
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 43.4
158% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 149
142% 223 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89%
Great: 89%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
223GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 225 227 200 214 221 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 462
Write 416
Mixed 303
SusWrite 222
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 35.6
129% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 256
213% 308 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 101%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 143 146 145 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 148
Write 145
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 144
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 86%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
5GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 90 93 91 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 235
Write 73
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 90
123% 111 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 7.8
672% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 12.8
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 10.1
813% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.9
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback