Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 147% UFO	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 160% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200915
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '20 at 21:31
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Memory 84.4 1-Core 149 2-Core 296 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 1,048 98% 816 Pts	64-Core 2,041 126% 2,041 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2281) CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	151% Outstanding	Lighting 202 Reflection 231 Parallax 230 164% 221 fps	MRender 265 Gravity 206 Splatting 143 161% 205 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 344GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 574 571 570 568 565 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	255% Outstanding	Read 2,034 Write 1,436 Mixed 742 SusWrite 609 267% 1,205 MB/s	4K Read 52.9 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 73.7 256% 93.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,350 DQ Write 1,224 DQ Mixed 965 812% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 255% Great: 254%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$86 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 181GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 406 407 422 419 342 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 418 Mixed 391 SusWrite 400 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 46.7 158% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 182 142% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$86 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 94GB free Firmware: M3CR032 SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 426 425 423 395 386 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 413 Mixed 385 SusWrite 414 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 46.9 153% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 184 143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 170GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 441 438 438 440 440 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 437 Mixed 384 SusWrite 440 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 89.8 4K Mixed 53.6 177% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 201 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 252GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 147 148 148 147 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 137 Write 127 Mixed 89.6 SusWrite 147 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 84%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 153 154 155 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 115 Write 109 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 153 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.6 273% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 93%
STECH Simple Drive 160GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 54GB free, PID ce02 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 36.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 34.1 44% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB 4,125 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 46.3 MC Write 38.3 MC Mixed 41.2 120% 41.9 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 36.3 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,135x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,713x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $154Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	912x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	880x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	697x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	275x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16