Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '20 at 18:51
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 812
78% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,256
78% 1,256 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.6% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 136
Parallax 120
103% 128 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 124
Splatting 102
90% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1467 1157 1073 1066 1102 1074 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,323
Write 2,158
Mixed 1,583
SusWrite 1,156
404% 1,805 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 71.7
237% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 867
641% 849 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 275%
Great: 372%
Pcie SSD 512GB
261GB free
Firmware: E8FM11.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 431 400 417 423 433 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 658
Write 790
Mixed 825
SusWrite 436
153% 677 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 39.9
140% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 345
336% 538 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 124%
Great: 267%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
80GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 474 474 469 471 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 476
Mixed 394
SusWrite 468
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 55.6
184% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
627GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 93 99 92 93 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 100
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 93.9
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 127 121 125 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 124
Mixed 18
SusWrite 124
72% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 35.8
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 28.3
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback