Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190624
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '20 at 19:26
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 74 1-Core 124 2-Core 224 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 700 67% 552 Pts	64-Core 1,014 63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F1) CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Lighting 68.8 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 85.2 56% 74.5 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 62.6 Splatting 57.7 51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 340 119 92 191 191 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 300 Write 457 Mixed 357 SusWrite 203 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 20.9 96% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 191 146% 198 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 98%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 789GB free Firmware: S3401103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 390 435 434 440 438 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 464 Write 428 Mixed 404 SusWrite 417 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 24.1 102% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 111 121% 197 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 102%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 600GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 136 136 136 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 140 Write 135 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 135 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 76GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 100 100 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 78.5 Write 74.5 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 98.8 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 69%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50 4,831 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 61GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 47 51 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	26% Poor	Read 40.3 Write 53.8 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 50 31% 42.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$83 8,676 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	89% Excellent	MC Read 36.4 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 30.7 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 25.1 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 92.5 43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)