Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FA506IV_FA506IV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200702
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '20 at 03:24
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 20,504 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 66.2 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 160 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 587 60% 485 Pts	64-Core 855 53% 855 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 1E21) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 29.1 8% 16.9 fps	MRender 15.8 Gravity 44.3 Splatting 53.1 33% 37.7 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 609 Write 909 Mixed 254 132% 590 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 16.2 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 169 100% 100 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 185%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$46 14,978 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 130GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 506 507 507 508 510 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 1,315 Write 991 Mixed 986 SusWrite 529 213% 955 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 30.5 89% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 204 142% 177 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 238%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 22GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 389 389 394 401 402 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 394 Write 366 Mixed 304 SusWrite 389 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 19.2 71% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 186 132% 168 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G32C16S4B.M16FE1 2x16GB 937 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 28.3 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 19.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 20,504 samples	7x
Ryzen 9 4900HAMDBench 74%, 1,531 samples	1x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	5x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	3x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	4x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA1T0TCK 1TBBench 173%, 25 samples	1x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	1x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	3x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	1x
16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 1x16GBMicronBench 46%, 6,167 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16