Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 17:54
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$309
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 171
72% 118 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 334
47% 339 Pts
64-Core 353
24% 353 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 5.97
3% 5.12 fps
MRender 8.33
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7
3% 5.86 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$39
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 485
Write 454
Mixed 294
91% 411 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 46.5
161% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 113
136% 241 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
719GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 82 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 79.8
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 85%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$9
15GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 141
Write 43
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 43.4
69% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
69% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 35%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 1GB
1GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 6 6.1 6 6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 5.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 6
10% 8.65 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
4GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5.2 4.5 5.3 4.3 5.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.8
10% 8.75 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.6
185% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 1,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $437

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback